Problem 374: Maximum Integer Partition Product
View on Project EulerProject Euler Problem 374 Solution
EulerSolve provides an optimized solution for Project Euler Problem 374, Maximum Integer Partition Product, with C++, Python, Java, and a step-by-step mathematical explanation.
Problem Summary For each positive integer \(n\), let \(f(n)\) be the largest product obtainable from a partition of \(n\) into distinct positive integers, and let \(m(n)\) be the number of parts in an optimal partition. Project Euler 374 asks for $$M(N)=\sum_{n=1}^{N} f(n)m(n)$$ at \(N=10^{14}\), reduced modulo $$P=982451653.$$ The local C++, Python, and Java solutions all exploit the same fact: optimal partitions fall into simple \(\Theta(\sqrt{n})\)-sized blocks, so the program never searches over partitions explicitly. Mathematical Approach Step 1: The optimal partition is almost consecutive Write an optimal partition with \(k\) parts as $$a_1 \lt a_2 \lt \cdots \lt a_k,\qquad a_1+\cdots+a_k=n.$$ If some adjacent gap is at least \(3\), say \(a_{i+1}-a_i\ge 3\), then replacing \((a_i,a_{i+1})\) by \((a_i+1,a_{i+1}-1)\) keeps the sum fixed, preserves distinctness, and increases the product because $$ (a_i+1)(a_{i+1}-1)-a_i a_{i+1} = a_{i+1}-a_i-1 \gt 0. $$ Therefore every optimal partition has adjacent differences only \(1\) or \(2\). For \(n\ge 2\), the maximizing partitions are thus “near-consecutive”: a run of consecutive integers with at most one missing value....
Detailed mathematical approach
Problem Summary
For each positive integer \(n\), let \(f(n)\) be the largest product obtainable from a partition of \(n\) into distinct positive integers, and let \(m(n)\) be the number of parts in an optimal partition. Project Euler 374 asks for
$$M(N)=\sum_{n=1}^{N} f(n)m(n)$$
at \(N=10^{14}\), reduced modulo
$$P=982451653.$$
The local C++, Python, and Java solutions all exploit the same fact: optimal partitions fall into simple \(\Theta(\sqrt{n})\)-sized blocks, so the program never searches over partitions explicitly.
Mathematical Approach
Step 1: The optimal partition is almost consecutive
Write an optimal partition with \(k\) parts as
$$a_1 \lt a_2 \lt \cdots \lt a_k,\qquad a_1+\cdots+a_k=n.$$
If some adjacent gap is at least \(3\), say \(a_{i+1}-a_i\ge 3\), then replacing \((a_i,a_{i+1})\) by \((a_i+1,a_{i+1}-1)\) keeps the sum fixed, preserves distinctness, and increases the product because
$$ (a_i+1)(a_{i+1}-1)-a_i a_{i+1} = a_{i+1}-a_i-1 \gt 0. $$
Therefore every optimal partition has adjacent differences only \(1\) or \(2\). For \(n\ge 2\), the maximizing partitions are thus “near-consecutive”: a run of consecutive integers with at most one missing value.
Step 2: The block parameter \(m\)
The baseline near-consecutive partition with \(m\) parts is
$$\{2,3,\dots,m+1\},$$
whose sum is
$$T_m = 2+3+\cdots+(m+1)=\frac{m(m+3)}{2}.$$
This is the left endpoint of the block where the optimal partition has exactly \(m\) parts. Hence the correct block index for a given \(n\) is
$$m=\max\left\{r:\frac{r(r+3)}{2}\le n\right\}.$$
The code computes this with the integer-square-root estimate
$$m\approx \frac{\sqrt{8n+9}-3}{2},$$
and then adjusts by at most a couple of integer steps to remove rounding issues.
Step 3: Closed form inside one block
Write
$$n=T_m+s,\qquad 0\le s\le m+1.$$
Since
$$T_{m+1}=\frac{(m+1)(m+4)}{2}=T_m+m+2,$$
the full \(m\)-block is the interval
$$T_m \le n \le T_{m+1}-1=\frac{(m+1)(m+4)}{2}-1.$$
Throughout this whole interval the optimal partition size is constant:
$$m(n)=m.$$
Step 4: The optimal partition shapes
If \(0\le s\le m\), the optimal partition is obtained from the consecutive set \(\{2,3,\dots,m+2\}\) by deleting exactly one value:
$$\{2,3,\dots,m+2\}\setminus\{m+2-s\}.$$
Its sum is
$$ \left(\sum_{j=2}^{m+2} j\right)-(m+2-s) = \frac{m(m+3)}{2}+s = n, $$
and its product is
$$f(n)=\frac{(m+2)!}{m+2-s}.$$
Multiplying by the part count gives
$$f(n)m(n)=m\frac{(m+2)!}{m+2-s},\qquad 0\le s\le m.$$
If \(s=m+1\), the “deleted value” would have to be \(1\), so the shape changes to
$$\{3,4,\dots,m+1,m+3\}.$$
Its product is
$$f(n)=\frac{(m+3)!}{2(m+2)},$$
hence
$$f(n)m(n)=m\frac{(m+3)!}{2(m+2)}.$$
This is exactly the piecewise formula implemented by all three solution files. The code keeps the middle case \(s=m\) as a separate branch, but mathematically it is simply the denominator-\(2\) instance of the first formula.
Worked Example: \(n=10\)
We have
$$T_3=\frac{3\cdot 6}{2}=9,\qquad T_4=\frac{4\cdot 7}{2}=14,$$
so \(m=3\) and \(s=10-9=1\). Therefore the optimal partition is
$$\{2,3,4,5\}\setminus\{4\}=\{2,3,5\}.$$
Thus
$$f(10)=2\cdot 3\cdot 5=30,\qquad m(10)=3,\qquad f(10)m(10)=90,$$
which matches the checkpoint in the C++ verifier.
Step 5: Summing one whole block
For a complete block, first sum the \(m+1\) terms with \(0\le s\le m\):
$$ \sum_{s=0}^{m} m\frac{(m+2)!}{m+2-s} = m(m+2)!\sum_{d=2}^{m+2}\frac{1}{d}, $$
where we reindexed with \(d=m+2-s\). The final point of the block contributes
$$m\frac{(m+3)!}{2(m+2)}.$$
So the complete \(m\)-block contribution is
$$ B_m = m(m+2)!\sum_{d=2}^{m+2}\frac{1}{d} + m\frac{(m+3)!}{2(m+2)}. $$
This is why the implementation only needs a running factorial and a running harmonic-style sum of modular inverses.
Step 6: Modular inverses
Because \(P\) is prime and every denominator satisfies \(2\le d\le m_{\max}+3 \lt P\), all required inverses exist modulo \(P\). The code precomputes them in linear time via
$$\mathrm{inv}[1]=1,\qquad \mathrm{inv}[i]=-\left\lfloor\frac{P}{i}\right\rfloor\mathrm{inv}[P\bmod i]\pmod{P}.$$
This follows from writing \(P=qi+r\), so \(r\equiv -qi\pmod P\), then multiplying by \(r^{-1}i^{-1}\). Once the inverse table is built, every full block is processed in \(O(1)\) modular arithmetic.
How the Code Works
The C++, Python, and Java implementations are structurally identical. They first compute \(m_{\max}=\max\{m:T_m\le N\}\), then precompute modular inverses up to \(m_{\max}+3\). During the main loop they maintain
$$\texttt{fact}=(m+2)!\pmod P,\qquad \texttt{harmonic}=\sum_{d=2}^{m+2}\frac{1}{d}\pmod P.$$
For each \(m\), the code knows the block start \(T_m\), the block end \(T_{m+1}-1\), and how much of that block is still inside the target range. All fully covered blocks use the closed form above; only the last block may be truncated, and the code handles that by summing the needed inverse segment explicitly.
The C++ file also checks the derivation against small exact values:
$$f(5)m(5)=12,\qquad f(10)m(10)=90,\qquad \sum_{n=1}^{100} f(n)m(n)=1683550844462.$$
Complexity Analysis
Since \(T_m\sim m^2/2\), the maximal block index satisfies \(m_{\max}=\Theta(\sqrt{N})\). Precomputing inverses, advancing the running factorial, and iterating over all blocks therefore costs \(O(\sqrt{N})\) time. The inverse table uses \(O(\sqrt{N})\) memory. Only the final block can be partial, so there is no hidden extra logarithmic factor.
Footnotes and References
- Problem page: https://projecteuler.net/problem=374
- Integer partition: Wikipedia — Integer partition
- Modular multiplicative inverse: Wikipedia — Modular multiplicative inverse
- Competitive programming reference for the inverse recurrence: cp-algorithms — Modular inverse
Problem 374 source code
C++
#include <algorithm>
#include <cstdint>
#include <iostream>
#include <string>
#include <vector>
#include <cmath>
#include <functional>
namespace {
using i64 = std::int64_t;
using u64 = std::uint64_t;
using u128 = unsigned __int128;
constexpr i64 kMod = 982451653LL;
constexpr u64 kLimit = 100000000000000ULL;
u64 isqrt_u64(const u64 n) {
u64 r = static_cast<u64>(std::sqrt(static_cast<long double>(n)));
while ((r + 1ULL) <= n / (r + 1ULL)) {
++r;
}
while (r > n / r) {
--r;
}
return r;
}
u64 max_m_for_n(const u64 n) {
// Largest m with m(m+3)/2 <= n.
u64 m = (isqrt_u64(8ULL * n + 9ULL) - 3ULL) / 2ULL;
while ((m + 1ULL) * (m + 4ULL) / 2ULL <= n) {
++m;
}
while (m > 0ULL && m * (m + 3ULL) / 2ULL > n) {
--m;
}
return m;
}
u128 factorial_u128(const u64 n) {
u128 f = 1U;
for (u64 i = 2; i <= n; ++i) {
f *= static_cast<u128>(i);
}
return f;
}
u128 value_exact_small(const u64 n) {
if (n == 0ULL) {
return 0U;
}
if (n == 1ULL) {
return 1U;
}
const u64 m = max_m_for_n(n);
const u64 t = m * (m + 3ULL) / 2ULL;
const u64 s = n - t;
const u128 fact_m2 = factorial_u128(m + 2ULL);
if (s <= m - 1ULL) {
return static_cast<u128>(m) * (fact_m2 / static_cast<u128>(m + 2ULL - s));
}
if (s == m) {
return static_cast<u128>(m) * (fact_m2 / 2U);
}
return static_cast<u128>(m) * (factorial_u128(m + 3ULL) / (2U * static_cast<u128>(m + 2ULL)));
}
i64 sum_mod(const u64 n) {
if (n == 0ULL) {
return 0;
}
i64 answer = 1; // n = 1
const u64 m_max = max_m_for_n(n);
const u64 inv_limit = m_max + 3ULL;
std::vector<i64> inv(static_cast<std::size_t>(inv_limit + 1ULL), 0);
inv[1] = 1;
for (u64 i = 2ULL; i <= inv_limit; ++i) {
inv[static_cast<std::size_t>(i)] =
(kMod - static_cast<i64>((static_cast<__int128>(kMod / static_cast<i64>(i)) *
inv[static_cast<std::size_t>(kMod % static_cast<i64>(i))]) %
kMod)) %
kMod;
}
const i64 inv2 = (kMod + 1LL) / 2LL;
i64 fact = 1; // running factorial up to `upto`
i64 harmonic = 0; // sum_{d=2..upto} inv[d] mod kMod
u64 upto = 1ULL;
for (u64 m = 1ULL; m <= m_max; ++m) {
const u64 target = m + 2ULL;
while (upto < target) {
++upto;
fact = static_cast<i64>((static_cast<__int128>(fact) * static_cast<i64>(upto)) % kMod);
if (upto >= 2ULL) {
harmonic += inv[static_cast<std::size_t>(upto)];
if (harmonic >= kMod) {
harmonic -= kMod;
}
}
}
const u64 start = m * (m + 3ULL) / 2ULL;
const u64 end_full = (m + 1ULL) * (m + 4ULL) / 2ULL - 1ULL;
const u64 len = std::min(n, end_full) - start + 1ULL;
const i64 mm = static_cast<i64>(m % static_cast<u64>(kMod));
const i64 base = static_cast<i64>((static_cast<__int128>(mm) * fact) % kMod);
i64 add = 0;
if (len <= m) {
const u64 d1 = m + 3ULL - len;
const u64 d2 = m + 2ULL;
i64 partial_h = 0;
for (u64 d = d1; d <= d2; ++d) {
partial_h += inv[static_cast<std::size_t>(d)];
if (partial_h >= kMod) {
partial_h -= kMod;
}
}
add = static_cast<i64>((static_cast<__int128>(base) * partial_h) % kMod);
} else if (len == m + 1ULL) {
add = static_cast<i64>((static_cast<__int128>(base) * harmonic) % kMod);
} else { // len == m + 2
add = static_cast<i64>((static_cast<__int128>(base) * harmonic) % kMod);
const i64 fact_m3 = static_cast<i64>((static_cast<__int128>(fact) * static_cast<i64>(m + 3ULL)) % kMod);
i64 extra = static_cast<i64>((static_cast<__int128>(mm) * fact_m3) % kMod);
extra = static_cast<i64>((static_cast<__int128>(extra) * inv2) % kMod);
extra = static_cast<i64>((static_cast<__int128>(extra) * inv[static_cast<std::size_t>(m + 2ULL)]) % kMod);
add += extra;
if (add >= kMod) {
add -= kMod;
}
}
answer += add;
if (answer >= kMod) {
answer -= kMod;
}
}
return answer;
}
bool run_checkpoints() {
if (value_exact_small(5ULL) != 12U) {
std::cerr << "Checkpoint failed: f(5)*m(5)\n";
return false;
}
if (value_exact_small(10ULL) != 90U) {
std::cerr << "Checkpoint failed: f(10)*m(10)\n";
return false;
}
u128 sum_100 = 0U;
for (u64 n = 1ULL; n <= 100ULL; ++n) {
sum_100 += value_exact_small(n);
}
if (sum_100 != 1683550844462ULL) {
std::cerr << "Checkpoint failed: sum up to 100\n";
return false;
}
return true;
}
} // namespace
int main(int argc, char** argv) {
bool skip_checkpoints = false;
for (int i = 1; i < argc; ++i) {
const std::string arg(argv[i]);
if (arg == "--skip-checkpoints") {
skip_checkpoints = true;
} else {
std::cerr << "Unknown argument: " << arg << '\n';
return 1;
}
}
if (!skip_checkpoints && !run_checkpoints()) {
return 2;
}
std::cout << sum_mod(kLimit) << '\n';
return 0;
}
Python
import math
def solve():
MOD = 982451653
LIMIT = 100_000_000_000_000
def isqrt(n):
return math.isqrt(n)
def max_m_for_n(n):
m = (isqrt(8*n + 9) - 3) // 2
while (m+1)*(m+4)//2 <= n:
m += 1
while m > 0 and m*(m+3)//2 > n:
m -= 1
return m
m_max = max_m_for_n(LIMIT)
inv_limit = m_max + 3
inv = [0] * (inv_limit + 1)
inv[1] = 1
for i in range(2, inv_limit + 1):
inv[i] = (MOD - MOD // i * inv[MOD % i] % MOD) % MOD
inv2 = (MOD + 1) // 2
answer = 1 # n=1
fact = 1
harmonic = 0
upto = 1
for m in range(1, m_max + 1):
target = m + 2
while upto < target:
upto += 1
fact = fact * upto % MOD
if upto >= 2:
harmonic = (harmonic + inv[upto]) % MOD
start = m * (m + 3) // 2
end_full = (m + 1) * (m + 4) // 2 - 1
ln = min(LIMIT, end_full) - start + 1
mm = m % MOD
base = mm * fact % MOD
if ln <= m:
d1 = m + 3 - ln
d2 = m + 2
partial_h = 0
for d in range(d1, d2 + 1):
partial_h = (partial_h + inv[d]) % MOD
add = base * partial_h % MOD
elif ln == m + 1:
add = base * harmonic % MOD
else: # ln == m + 2
add = base * harmonic % MOD
fact_m3 = fact * (m + 3) % MOD
extra = mm * fact_m3 % MOD * inv2 % MOD * inv[m + 2] % MOD
add = (add + extra) % MOD
answer = (answer + add) % MOD
return str(answer)
if __name__ == '__main__':
print(solve())
Java
public class Euler374 {
static final long kMod = 982451653L;
static long isqrt(long n) {
long approx = (long) Math.sqrt(n);
while ((approx + 1) <= n / (approx + 1))
approx++;
while (approx > n / approx)
approx--;
return approx;
}
static long maxMForN(long n) {
long m = (isqrt(8 * n + 9) - 3) / 2;
while ((m + 1) * (m + 4) / 2 <= n)
m++;
while (m > 0 && m * (m + 3) / 2 > n)
m--;
return m;
}
static String solve() {
long n = 100000000000000L;
if (n == 0)
return "0";
long answer = 1;
long mMax = maxMForN(n);
int invLimit = (int) (mMax + 3);
int[] inv = new int[invLimit + 1];
inv[1] = 1;
for (int i = 2; i <= invLimit; i++) {
inv[i] = (int) ((kMod - (kMod / i) * inv[(int) (kMod % i)] % kMod) % kMod);
}
long inv2 = (kMod + 1) / 2;
long fact = 1;
long harmonic = 0;
int upto = 1;
for (long m = 1; m <= mMax; m++) {
long target = m + 2;
while (upto < target) {
upto++;
fact = (fact * upto) % kMod;
if (upto >= 2) {
harmonic = (harmonic + inv[upto]) % kMod;
}
}
long start = m * (m + 3) / 2;
long endFull = (m + 1) * (m + 4) / 2 - 1;
long len = Math.min(n, endFull) - start + 1;
long mm = m % kMod;
long base = (mm * fact) % kMod;
long add = 0;
if (len <= m) {
int d1 = (int) (m + 3 - len);
int d2 = (int) (m + 2);
long partialH = 0;
for (int d = d1; d <= d2; d++) {
partialH += inv[d];
}
partialH %= kMod;
add = (base * partialH) % kMod;
} else if (len == m + 1) {
add = (base * harmonic) % kMod;
} else {
add = (base * harmonic) % kMod;
long factM3 = (fact * (m + 3)) % kMod;
long extra = (mm * factM3) % kMod;
extra = (extra * inv2) % kMod;
extra = (extra * inv[(int) (m + 2)]) % kMod;
add = (add + extra) % kMod;
}
answer = (answer + add) % kMod;
}
return Long.toString(answer);
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
System.out.println(solve());
}
}