{
  "schema_version": 1,
  "problem_number": "AMR-050-0053",
  "title": "A Pentagonal Counterexample to a Poncelet Squared-Side Criterion",
  "author": {
    "name": "Alper Ferudun",
    "affiliation": "Mercury Software GmbH",
    "url": "https://github.com/AlperTheKing"
  },
  "abstract": "We construct an explicit fixed circle and strictly nested noncircular ellipse admitting a Poncelet family of primitive convex pentagons with constant sum of squared side lengths, even though the circle center is neither the ellipse center nor either focus. If t is the unique root in (1/10,1/5) of 25t^3-50t^2-40t+8=0, the invariant value is 175/18-(625/48)t. All tangencies occur on the actual edge segments. This gives an exact counterexample to the necessity direction of the fixed-family center-or-focus criterion proposed in Murad 2026, Section 6, Conjecture 1, without contradicting its proved triangle results. The construction starts from a bicentric circle pair. For the polygon obtained by unit inversion of the bicentric vertices about the inner center, we express the squared-side sum as a two-step normal trace. Jacobi's bicentric parametrization and the published MI-II cyclic identity of Khare, Lakshminarayan and Sukhatme show that this trace is constant. A nonsingular projectivity agrees with vertex inversion on the outer circle and carries the complete nested Poncelet configuration to the required circle/ellipse pair. An isolated cubic root then supplies a strictly convex primitive five-cycle, and Poncelet closure supplies the whole family. The investigation originated with frozen record AMR-050-0053, invariant k811. That source uses incompatible descriptions of its dual construction. We prove the squared-side invariance of two precise interpretations separately, crediting the published bicentric cosine theorem and MI-II identity, but do not silently repair or claim unqualified closure of k811. Two standard-library exact checkers certify the displayed algebraic pentagon and distinguish the reciprocal constructions on exact fixtures; the all-family theorem rests on the analytic proof, not finite sampling. This English preprint is AI-assisted, originating-researcher self-audited, and unrefereed. Novelty remains undetermined; no independent human review, proof-assistant verification, guaranteed indexing, or absolute-priority claim is made.",
  "result_type": "COMPLETE_COUNTEREXAMPLE_TO_ADJACENT_CONJECTURE",
  "categories": [
    "math.DS",
    "math.MG"
  ],
  "keywords": [
    "Poncelet porism",
    "bicentric polygons",
    "squared side lengths",
    "convex pentagon",
    "central conic",
    "Jacobi elliptic functions",
    "cyclic identities",
    "projective geometry",
    "exact computation",
    "counterexample"
  ],
  "manuscript_version_date": "2026-10-02",
  "publication_date": "2026-10-02",
  "publication_date_kind": "first public online release",
  "version": "1.0",
  "date_modified": "2026-10-02",
  "presentation_revision_only": false,
  "doi_archived_file_version": "1.0",
  "status": "unrefereed preprint",
  "canonical_url": "https://eulersolve.org/papers/amr-050-0053/",
  "pdf_url": "https://eulersolve.org/papers/amr-050-0053/paper.pdf?v=0afb30180869",
  "doi": "10.5281/zenodo.23099540",
  "zenodo_record_url": "https://zenodo.org/records/23099540",
  "license": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/",
  "scope_caveat": "The two explicitly distinguished reciprocal constructions D and I of a strictly nested bicentric Poncelet polygon have phase-independent squared-side sums for all admissible periods, by credited published-theorem transfer. An exact strictly nested circle/ellipse family of primitive convex pentagons has constant squared-side sum 175/18-625t/48, with 25t^3-50t^2-40t+8=0 and 1/10<t<1/5, although its circumcenter is neither the ellipse center nor either focus. This refutes the necessity direction of Murad2026 Section6 Conjecture1. The ambiguous original k811 definition is not silently repaired and no extra frozen-corpus closure is counted. AI-assisted, self-audited, unrefereed preprint. No independent human review, proof-assistant formalization or absolute-priority certification is claimed.",
  "files": {
    "paper.pdf": {
      "sha256": "0afb30180869c500c4c1805e60e76fb6778d8469b3347c48d31907758e1a7812"
    },
    "source.zip": {
      "sha256": "855b5927a1599ef5414238fc5c08670dfafc73298ee0197264e8137174502215"
    },
    "verification_report.md": {
      "sha256": "348f7e0b144002ab03ede43d74efbe00afa65c6b67499705e16bbd262dee6090"
    }
  },
  "ai_use_disclosure": "AI-assisted tools supported research, computation, proof development, and manuscript preparation. The author remains responsible for all claims and the final text.",
  "original_problem_resolved": false,
  "theorem_scope_resolved": true,
  "whole_source_record_resolved": false,
  "retained_public_get_count": 4,
  "retained_metadata_stable_before_after": false,
  "adjacent_conjecture_refuted": true,
  "adjacent_source_in_frozen_corpus": false,
  "source_definition_ambiguity_retained": true,
  "frozen_record_closure_increment": 0
}
